English Speech Against Physical Punishment of Children :: Papers

English spoken communication Against Physical Punishment of Children Good Morning/Afternoon ladies, gentlemen and chairperson. I am also arguing against the motion that states, this house believes that physical punishment including savor young clawren is wrong. I am a firm believer that a short, sharp smack can keep chel atomic number 18n under control. This doesnt miserly they should be beaten up or even marked, but uncompromising and fair punishment will benefit a tyke in the long run. Please picture this scene a young child of around 3 years is having a temper tantrum in the middle of a meddling high street because his mum wont buy him a toy car. He tries to run past from his commence, screaming and sh go forthing at the same time. To stop the noise the mother gives in a buys the toy car. Now ask yourself who is in taper here, the mother or the child? After all, the child gets his own mien and now knows exactly what to do next time he wants so mething. In these circumstances, p arents may have to resort to a smack to one, get the child listening and doing what they are told, two, stop the noise and temper tantrum and finally, for the childs benefit and own safety. Also, what or who is going to stop an out of control child running out into the middle of a busy road? A quick smack is a lot slight pain full then getting knocked down by a car or even a bus There are many in favour of the government leaving the law as it stands that parents have the right to smack their children. Groups such as Family and Youth guardianship feel politicians should let parents get on with bringing up their children as they see fit, and warn that any change in the law would adventure turning thousands of parents into criminals. They also feel a ban on savour would be impossible to enforce. The opposition may argue that there are other forms of punishment which are just as effective as smacking. For example, igno ring the