Badminton Essay Essay

Self-efficacy and social brings atomic number 18 two guiding principles in the fill of sociology of blow. Self-efficacy is an souls personal estimate of confidence in his or her cap talent to accomplish a certain level of performance, whereas social charm occurs when separates affect ones emotions, opinions, behaviors and choices. These sociocultural factors atomic number 18 linked to Figueroas fashion model, which influence my participation in badminton. In this essay, the focus in on self-efficacy and social stigma-related socio-cultural factors, which atomic number 18 constituent elements in the capers socialization process and countenance influenced my active involution in Badminton.The purpose of this assignment is to evaluate the contact that sociocultural influences have had on my decision to play on the Moreton verbalise College badminton team.Professor Peter Figueroa developed a tool also cognise as Figueroas model, which investigates the issues surroundin g access, equity and equality in athletics and physical activity. It is structured over five contrary levels individual, social, institutional, structural and cultural, these argonas are used to investigate the shipway in which inequities challenge the area of sport and physical activity. All five levels connect within each other and they all influence the shaping of the overall effect. They show the different functions that reinforce, create, carry away and eliminate bars and inequities within sport and physical activity. The level of Figeuroas Framework that affects my participation in badminton the greatest was the interpersonal level and individual level. The interpersonal level of Figueroas framework is used to investigate the relationships that affect whether an individual will develop a lifelong association with sport. Most individuals are influenced directly or indirectly by the people around them much(prenominal) as parents, peers, siblings, teachers, coaches, or spo rting role models.In particular, one barrier that had an impact upon my participation in Badminton is self-efficacy. The theory of self-efficacy was developed within the framework of social cognitive theory, which views individuals as proactive agents in the regulation of their cognition, penury, actions,and emotions. When playing badminton I feel vulnerable to this problem of self-efficacy as my self-esteem is affected by my performance because I feel as if I am judged by how well I perform. As I have much(prenominal) luxuriously expectations to perform well in badminton, I am genuinely critical and hard on myself. This leads to poor self-efficacy which forces me to believe I do not have the capability for success in Badminton. Someone with high self-efficacy is confident and motivated to work toward a learning goal and someone such(prenominal) as myself with low self-efficacy in badminton is not as motivated, which effects how much effort is put into a particular task. Self -efficacy is based on a social learning theory and is a construct that affects motivation and thus preempt promote or inhibit learning different skills. Consequently, as Allender et al. (2006) suggests, when an individual has limited confidence in their own ability to perform, purpose levels decline and inevitably, participation ceases. Pratt et al. (1999) represent that perceived competence and sport ability beliefs had a strong and direct impact on enjoyment. As enjoyment is a precursor to ongoing participation, it is thus unvarnished that self-efficacy is an important factor in my participation in Badminton.A involve by McCarthy, Jones and Clark-Carter (2008) investigated the sources of enjoyment report by youth sport participants and found that positive parental involvement was one of the most frequently reported results by young males and females. This implies that when children in sport perceive parental involvement as positive, they are more likely to enjoy their sportin g experience. When we are young, our families influence us more than outsiders do. If your parents played sports, took you to sporting contests, helped you learn elemental sport skills, and encouraged you to participate, chances are you gave sports a try. It has been proven that parental influence extends to the parents perception of the sports their children choose to participate in. That is, parents can transmit values by dint of communicating their beliefs, acceptance, and support to their childs participation in sport. legion(predicate) studies have demonstrated the importance of parental interpretation, often showing that too much parental feedback causes undue stress in young athletes and can cause them not to participate in certain sports, but the purloin amounts of encouragement and support can increase enjoyment and longevity of the athletes involvement. agnaticinterpretation is a powerful mechanism because it communicates expected and valued behaviors. Children inter nalise parental values and expectations therefore children try to behave in ways that maximize their acceptance in the social setting. Thus, as my parents communicate that they do not value badminton as an exceptional sport, it is unlikely for me to participate in this sport. Also as my parents are not actively involved, nor intentionally allow for sporting experiences for the sport of badminton it is very unlikely that I was ever exposed to the sporting world of badminton as a child.In conclusion, self-efficacy and social influences are two of the central motives that have influenced my decision to play on the college badminton team. These sociocultural factors target the Interpersonal and Structural level of Figueroas framework. The influence of outsiders such as family and peers and my perceived capability at a particular conviction to perform the specified badminton skills has led me to the decision of not participating in the Moreton Bay College badminton team.